click to show more information

click to hide/show information About your Search

20130201
20130228
Search Results 0 to 21 of about 22 (some duplicates have been removed)
answer. >> what about this jewish lobby business? he apologized for using that phrase, but listen to this exchange with lindsey graham. >> name one person who is intimidated by the israeli lobby in the u.s. senate. >> the use of intimidation -- i should have used influence. >> he could not name one person publicly. this is gamesmanship of the first order. you have conversations with plenty members of congress, and they feel one way about some of the issues in the middle east and feel they simply cannot move an inch on questions involving israel. >> is chuck hagel in command of the issues that he will be grappling with here? >> i do not think anybody would have come off well. it was a halting performance by chuck hagel, and chuck hagel, to underline what nina said earlier, is not a verbally- nimble person. he is not known for sound bites, not somebody that you go to if you want a quotation on a deadline. he will give you thought full context. >> god forbid. [laughter] >> more than anything else, i could not get over the back during quality. yes or no, yes or no, senator. john mccai
about this jewish lobby phrase? he apologized for using that phrase, but listen to this exchange. >> name one person who is intimidated by the israeli lobby in the u.s. senate. >>he use of intimition -- i should have used influence. >> he could not name one person publicly. this is gamesmanship of the first order. you have conversations with plenty of members of congress and they feel one way about some of the issues in the middle east, that they simply cannot move an inch on issues involving israel. >> is he in command of the issues? >> i dnot think anybody would have come off well. i think it was a halting performance by chuck hagel, and chuck hagel underline what nina said earlier, not a burbling- nimble person. not a guy that is known for sound bites, not somebody that you would go to for a quotation on deadlines. he would give the thought of context or any answer he would give -- >> god forbid. [laughter] >> more than anything else, i could not get over the badger and quality. yes or no. yes or no, senator. john mccain was looking for vindication for the surge. chuck hagel w
. >> what about this jewish lobby business? he apologized for using that phrase. listen to this exchange with lindsey gram. >> name one person who is intimited by the israeli lobby in the united states. >> the use of intimidation -- i should have used influence. >> he could not name one pern publblicly. this is gamesmanship of the first ororder. you have conversations with plty of members of congress, and they feel one way about some of the issues in the middl east, feel thathey simply cannot move an inch on that. >> is he in command of the issues he will be grappling with? >> i do not think anybody would have come off wl. it was a halting performance by chuck hagel. chuck hagel, to underline what nina sd earlier is not a verbally-nimble person. not somebody known for sound bites, not somebody that you would go to for a quotation on a deadline. he would give the thoughtful context. >> god forbid.wright, who once context? [laughter] i cod not get over the badger and quality. yes or no. yeoro, senator. john mccain was looking for viication for the surge. chuck hagel was not going to give i
law. now is going to ll u us it's our box >> the cyber wars. china hacng us blind? >> ty are targeting a broad of wetern organizations. sreme courthe the death penalty. >> he might as well p pick a cad the deck to figure penalty.get the death >> not a single justice will say is unconstitutional, but someme it's a bad idea. in senate, the brashsh new kid on the block. i was elected t to represent 26 texans and to speak the truth. captioned by t national captioning g institute --www.ncicap.org-- >> sequestration. march 1st is the deadline. a pentagon warns 800,000 employees will have to and federalleave cut inrs will taka 20% for six months. flying will be a little tougher. long lines at the airport, avel delays. wt to be careful what you eat. food safety inspectors will be effected. fbi and other law enforcent will ta a hit. salary for members of congress is safe. they say nonone of this was to happen. >> it was never meant to become unimplemented policy. they face a simple choice. they willing to compromise, protectct vital investments in education, health care, national curity, and al
game and armageddon scenarios. >> it was his idea. he signed it into law and now he's going to tell us that it's all our fault? >> the cyber wars. is china hacking us blind? >> of starting a broad swath of western organizations. >> you might as well pick a card out of the deck as to who will get the death penalty. >> some of them will say it's a bad idea. >> the brash new kid on the block. >> i was elected to speak the truth. captioned by the national captioning institute --www.ncicap.org-- quite sequestration. march 1st is the deadline. they warn 800,000 civilian employees will have to take unpaid leave in federal employee workers will have to take a cut for the next six months. the long lines at the airport, travel delays. you may want to be careful what you e because food safety inspectors will be affected. they will be taking a hit. salaries in congress are safe, but they tell us none of this is supposed to happen. >> it was never meant to become implemented policy. >> and now they face a simple choice. are they willing to compromise to protect vital investments and all the jobs th
signed it into law and now he's going to tell us that it's all our fault? >> the cyber wars. is china acting as a blind? >> this is run by the chinese liberation army and is targeting a broad swath of western companies. >> and a look at the death penalty. >> you may as well pick a card out of the deck. >> not a single justice will say is unconstitutional, but some will say it's a bad idea. >> in the senate, the brash new kid on the block. >> at the end of the day, i was elected to speak for 26 million texans and speak the truth. >> quest rationed. march 1st as the deadline. they warn 800,000 civilian employees -- sequestration. a 20% cut in pay for six months. flying will be tougher. long lines at the airport, travel delays. you may want to be careful what you eat because food safety inspectors will be effected. fbi and law enforcement will take a hit. member salaries in congress are safe but the staff will take a hit. they tell us non was supposed to happen. >> it was never supposed to be implemented policy. >> they face a simple choice. are they willing to compromise to protect vita
. they will be taking a hit. salaries in congress are safe, but they tell us none of this is supposed to happen. >> it was never meant to become implemented policy. >> and now they face a simple choice. are they willing to compromise to protect vital investments and all the jobs that depend on them? or would they rather put hundreds of thousands of jobs and our entire economy at risk just to protect a few special interest tax loopholes that benefit only the wealthiest and biggest corporations? >> of sequestration was never meant to be implemented, then why was it implemented? >> the president is the one guy who can step above it and he's just playing politics. >> are we having fun yet? >> there is a sense of sleepwalking as we head toward the first of march and i think republicans are making it a serious political mistake to be on the subject of the issue in underestimating how much of their buying to be blamed for what happens. >> do you think the armageddon scenario is being overplayed? >> it is the biggest since the mayan calendar. it's ridiculous. here we are spending $3 trillion per year f
on the canal was an ideal family vacation -- three generations, the scenery coming to us, a capable skipper, and not a care in the world. you are so good at this! >> production assistance for "inside washington" was provided by allbritton communications and politico, reporting on the legislative, executive, and political arena. >> the greatest nation on earth cannot keep conducting its business by drifting from one manufactured crisis to the next. >> this week on "inside washington," the state of the unit according to barack obama, and the republican response. >> his solution to gradually every problem we face is for washington to tax more and spend more. >> a call for an increase in the minimum wage. >> why what we want to make it harder for small employers to hire people? >> a plea for tougher gun laws. >> the families of new town deserve a vote. >> most aggressive campaign in history to destroy our second amendment rights. >> filibustering chuck hagel. the pope resigns. what lies ahead for the catholic church? >> the church is a 200-plus- year-old institution that has not changed very mu
cell technology, we think it can. weyerhaeuser, growing ideas. >> lead us to a better solution. if you do not, mr. president, you will go down in history as one of the most irresponsible commanders in chief in the history of the country. >> this week on "inside washington," gunfight at the sequestration corral. >> i believe they should at least pass a smaller package that will delay the economically damaging effects of the sequester for a few more months until congress finds a way. >> john brennan, the cia, and drone strikes. >> i never believed it is better to kill a terrorist than to detain him. >> marco rubio, savior of the republican party, and immigration debate. >> this is about getting it right for the american people and those suffering under an immigration system that does not work well for anybody. >> after the lights go out at the super bowl, thoughts about the nation's crumbling infrastructure. captioned by the national captioning institute --www.ncicap.org-- seesutawney phil did not his shadow this year, which means spring will come early. tell that to the folks in boston
not in going to price it out, because those are the people who do the jobs none of us wanted to. >> i thought that was illegal immigrants. >> i think the odds are that he will not get it and he will not fight for it that hard. the last guy who got a minimum wage increase was ted kennedy and he actually got it. >> who will be the ted kennedy of the senate is an interesting question, too. you cannot pay somebody $9 an hour, you probably should not be any business. >> you talk about the economy as it is a moral instruments. even as i agree with you on that, that does not change the fact that it will hurt a generation of young people, and if you add on to that legalizing 11 million immigrants, a lot of whom are low-skilled, you are guaranteeing that the glove end of the scale, you will really hurt the chances of young, less skilled people of getting jobs. it is an economic fact. it may not be just, but it is true. >> that is thwhat i am asking, where is the evidence of that having happened when the minimum wage is increased? >> if that is the case, why not make it $15? >> the argument is not true
will create blight for these people. >> those other people who do the jobs that none of us want to do. i think the odds are that he will not get it and he will not fight for it that hard. the last person who fought for a minimum-wage increase was ted kennedy and he actually got it. >> who will be the time kennedy in the senate is an interesting question, too. >> if you cannot pay someone $9 an hour, you probably should not be a business. >> i agree with him -- >> you talk about the economy as if it is a moral and estimate. even if i agree with you, it does not change the fact that it will hurt young people and immigrants, a lot of whom are low-skilled, you are guaranteeing them the low end of the scale and will hurt the chances of young, less skilled people getting jobs. it is an economic fact. it may not be just, but it is true. >> is what i am asking -- where is the evidence of that having happened -- >> why don't you make it $15? >> but you are making the argument -- >> if you are saying it has no effect on employment -- >> obviously it has an effect! the question is, are you going to ask p
liberal friends that is okay to kick the can down the road.. >>>> he actually used those words. >> terrible idea. it courts all sorts of disasters. cited interest rate spikes -- it could haen overnight. it takes a long time to fix these problems. we have got to start on it now. sequestration is a cde, ugly tool. but if it has the effect of making people serious about entitlement and tax reforms, it would not be so bad. >> colby, what do you think?k? >> going back to charles' column, he says that this the first timeme since the election that presint obama has been put on defense. i don't think that is true. i agreree with m mark the republicans will bear the brunt of it ininitially, because they would be the obstructionists. looking at it and share political terms -- this h has cooool implications. -- global implications. >> nina, you think the american people are getting fed up with this? it has been going on for years. >> and more and more, worse and worse. just, for example, , and infrastructure, which we will talk about later, but you had a five-year transportation bill. no
that it is okay to kick this down the road. >> he actually used those words. >> terrible idea. it courts all kinds of disasters. sounded -- the interest rate spikes. it takes a long time to fix these problems. sequestration is a crude, ugly tool, but if it had the effect of making people get serious about entitlement reform, it would not be so bad. >> colby, what do you think? >> going back to charles' column, he says that it is the first time since the election the president obama has been on the defense. i don't think that is true. i agree with mark on this, that republicans will bear the brunt of this initially because they are seen as the obstructionists. looking at it in sheer political terms, this as global implications for the u.s. economy tanking as a result of this. >> you think the american people are getting fed up with this? this has been going on for years. >> and worse and worse, so that there is no planning. you have a five-year transportation bill, then a two-year transportation bill, then and nothing transportation bill. >> what does it take to make the government do the right thi
Search Results 0 to 21 of about 22 (some duplicates have been removed)